Never had it happen (had to google the word)

...There are reasons my computer autolocks when the screensaver comes on, including if I, through trained-in reflex, trigger the screensaver manually when standing up to go to the bathroom when I'm home by myself.

Had to google "frape". I suppose I am getting old. I'll be getting a lawn next so I can tell young whippersnappers to get off it. 

This is actually pretty old though. We used to do it to each other in high school. In 1994.

Bite me, you harpy. It's a brilliant descriptive term; I didn't recognise it when I first heard it used, but I correctly guessed what it meant just from the word itself and from the context.

It's a horrible, horrible word and trivialises something which is really serious.

I'm sure they can find some other word to use.

Had to google "frape". I suppose I am getting old. I'll be getting a lawn next so I can tell young whippersnappers to get off it. 

This is actually pretty old though. We used to do it to each other in high school. In 1994.

Get a lawn close to a high school like we did.  Lots of whippersnappers to order off the lawn, plus the odd bit of trash every few days to pick up while mumbling "damn kids"!

Question for gay people: What do your friends write as your status when they frape you? Or do gay people have classier friends than straight people?

Yes, Johnny. Gay people have classier friends than straight people. There's a whole entrance exam.

(Fner, fner, I said entrance)

Actually, language affects thinking and this is a science fact.

The Sapir-Worf Hypothesis! It's some fascinating reading.

Also, add me to the list of people who dislike the casual use of the word "rape". I mean, if we want to pick a different uncomfortable word to use there to vividly illustrate the point of why it makes some people uncomfortable, how about "castrate"? Or is that one not visceral enough? Is there a single word for "the sensation of getting kicked in the testicles with intent to harm" that we could use instead?

Fortunately folks, we do not have to use an offensive term, as a better one already exists.

Baggy pantsing:

baggy pantsing: v.
[Georgia Tech] A “baggy pantsing” is used to reprimand hackers who incautiously leave their terminals unlocked. The affected user will come back to find a post from them on internal newsgroups discussing exactly how baggy their pants are, an accepted stand-in for “unattentive user who left their work unprotected in the clusters”. A properly-done baggy pantsing is highly mocking and humorous. It is considered bad form to post a baggy pantsing to off-campus newsgroups or the more technical, serious groups. A particularly nice baggy pantsing may be “claimed” by immediately quoting the message in full, followed by your sig block; this has the added benefit of keeping the embarassed victim from being able to delete the post. Interesting baggy-pantsings have been done involving adding commands to login scripts to repost the message every time the unlucky user logs in; Unix boxes on the residential network, when cracked, oftentimes have their homepages replaced (after being politely backed-up to another file) with a baggy-pants message; .plan files are also occasionally targeted. Usage: “Prof. Greenlee fell asleep in the Solaris cluster again; we baggy-pantsed him to git.cc.class.2430.flame.” Compare derf.

At my high school, one baggy-pantsed by posting an announcement to the chat board that the forgetful user was gay, then logging them out, logging in as yourself, and posting a message of support for the "brave announcement". This had absolutely nothing to do with whether the person actually was gay. While homosexuality was not a true closet there -- we all lived in the same two dormitories, and everyone had a good idea of who was and was not gay -- no one openly discussed it; it was considered poor form in 1994 Mississippi. Thus, even if the forgetful one was gay, it was certain that no one would ever come out of the closet by posting to a public BBS. It wasn't done to be cruel or humiliating -- it was simply culture jamming, pretending to do something everyone knew you wouldn't actually do.... just like praising your baggy pants.

If someone asks you to check your word choice, please do so, because that is the right thing to do. This is about a more severe reaction than just being annoyed.

I have the greatest respect for your viewpoint, and it was not my intention to offend you. I think you might well have a point (or at least some solid reasoning for believing what you do), so please understand I'm not referring to you when I ask, "where do we draw the line with these fuckers"?

Say someone objects to the word "niggardly" as a descriptor, and demands that we remove all mention of it from public discourse, because they find it racially offensive. Do we argue against it on the basis that they're ignorantly connecting the word to a racist phrase with an entirely different etymology? Do we apologize for offending them and pledge to respect their feelings in future (despite the fact that they only took umbridge because they were misinformed), and so allow a small minority of easily-offended pinheads to dictate the usage of language for the entire English-speaking populace?

I was being facetious before, in that I don't give a damn what Franki says about Blake Lively, but that's easily a turn of phrase that someone somewhere could take exception to, and according to TIP and Scix, every single person that pipes up with "But I am OFFENDED!" must be afforded respect, and is entitled to force to you alter your speech patterns. And I'm trying so hard to be reasonable with these ridiculous fuckers, I'm fighting hard not to dismiss them out of hand as mindless hippies, but the claim that every person has a right to edit the word choice of the entire population is just preposterous. It's a skip and a jump away from banning literature like the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and then to some prickly asshole getting it into his head we ought to put content warnings on games like Portal 2.

A very small percentage of the population will get angry when I say niggardly. Sometimes there isn't even a clear cut inoffensive option: some Native Americans will get shirty if their ethnicity is not referred to as American Indian, others think that American Indian is a dumb term and that Native American suffices as a name. Surely there's at least got a be a numbers game in play. 80-90% of the population can probably agree that "kike" is a racially offensive term, with no other usage then to refer to jewish people in a contemptuous and aggressive manner.

Do you think that comedy skits like this one should be banned from television? If you don't think it should, what's the philosophical distinction between banning a TV program for upsetting language, and censoring people's speech to make it less offensive? Incidentally, (although it's hardly a fair test as the sample size most likely contains a disproportionately large number of existing fans who sought out the video,) only about one and a half percent of people clicked dislike instead of like on that video, suggesting that it made a lot more people laugh then it did sad.

It's a piss-poor metaphor, too. It's just fvandalism. It's not like you can wake up the next morning, delete rape from your profile, and post a sarcastic status about how your friends are such dicks.