General Statistics
Total Posts: 277284
Total Topics: 4693
Online Today: 31
Online Ever: 127, on March 13, 2007, 12:56:10 PM
Users Online
Totals
Users: 14
Guests: 11
Total: 25
Index Pages: 1 [2]
Seven Reply #20 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 13, 2006, 04:50:19 PM
Guinea Pig

Renown: +19/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 738

Mmmm, your so good to me Eggplant Mike

Though if you want to be a lazy fat ass and eat fast food everyday than you might want to drink some wine.

McDonalds had better start supersizing on the Merlot shakes then!
Logged

Ego scratched under the sole of my sneaker, feel like falling asleep with my head in the speaker - Miss Kittin, Allergic
12595_mr._tester.png
MeowBerry Reply #21 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 13, 2006, 04:53:27 PM

Renown: +15/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,305

Merlot shakes? Thats an interesting idea.  ;D
Logged

The stone sky dances like the devil, the clouds rain upon them, saying that God is unhappy.

Badger Reply #22 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 13, 2006, 04:54:04 PM
Renown: +169/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,548

Swift as a deer, size of a dog, head like a monkey

Alcohol is good for you in moderate amounts but it's still a poison. You can get all the same benefits from grape juice as wine.

*snip*

Citation, please.

Seven:  *snerk*
Logged

""We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer
Barefoot Priestess
Badger Reply #23 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 13, 2006, 04:56:32 PM
Renown: +169/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,548

Swift as a deer, size of a dog, head like a monkey

Funny how you quoted this sentenance: There's no way not to conclude that alchol is bad.
But not this one: However, looking at the larger picture alchol is very bad for society and the statistical human being.
All about context.

Funny how you didn't respond to any of the points I made regarding your absolutist statements.
Logged

""We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer
Barefoot Priestess
MeowBerry Reply #24 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 13, 2006, 05:05:42 PM

Renown: +15/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,305

Badger: http://archives.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/alternative/03/31/wine.heart.wmd/

There's one link, just google it or something if you want more. Youll see its the flavanoids not the alcohol that make red wine so good for you. I also read somewhere else that its only red wine and red grape juice. The white wine and grape juice dont do much at all. Its pretty interesting.
Logged

The stone sky dances like the devil, the clouds rain upon them, saying that God is unhappy.

Badger Reply #25 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 13, 2006, 06:47:05 PM
Renown: +169/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,548

Swift as a deer, size of a dog, head like a monkey

What about the other health benefits, aside from the heart issues?  The more the studies roll in, the more they seem to indicate that it's not just red wine for your heart that's a healthy choice.

Do, for example, the same benefits with regard to Alzheimer's and dementia, bone density, or cholesterol occur with grape juice, or is it just the heart issue (given my family history with Alzheimer's, I'm sure you can understand my interest in this issue)?  What I'm getting at is that there may be more than one reason alcohol could be a healthy consumption choice, so it's not just a matter of, "Well, I guess if you can't get off your fat ass to exercise and eat right, you might as well drink red wine instead."  You can dismiss it that way, if you like, though.

By the way, one reason one might see different results from red and white wine or juice may have a lot to do with the pressing process.  Red wine and juice are red not just because they come from red grapes specifically, but because the juice sits with those skins to absorb the color and the tannins (integral to the formation of the structure of the bossier reds like Cabernet or Zin).  With white wine and juice, the absorption of the color and tannin usually isn't key, so the must will sit on the skins less - thus absorbing fewer of the compounds that might be contained in those skins.  Basic winemaking facts.  Winemaking really is pretty interesting.
Logged

""We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer
Barefoot Priestess
MeowBerry Reply #26 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 13, 2006, 06:59:34 PM

Renown: +15/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,305

The flavanoids are whats really good for you, which is in any type of alcohol. Also in fruit juice, and green tea. The clogs that cause a heart attack also increase risks of dementia so a healthy heart also helps. I know green tea prevents dementia and juice has the same flavanoids.
Logged

The stone sky dances like the devil, the clouds rain upon them, saying that God is unhappy.

sinic Reply #27 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 13, 2006, 07:04:27 PM
Certified Organic

Renown: +125/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,234

Slack.

Don't forget about the benefits of beer!  For centuries beer was a staple part of people's diets.  I remember going through this exhibit on Russian history and there was this ornate-looking stein-like-thing and it said it was a mug used by laborers to recieve their daily beer allowance while working.  Unfiltered beer is full of all kinds of good stuff. 
Logged

"When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other." -Eric Hoffer

House has a posse.
Puppy cam is:  Offline

12595_mr._tester.png
CuddlyCuteKitten Reply #28 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 14, 2006, 09:44:32 AM
Game Master
Renown: +17/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 779

Funny how you quoted this sentenance: There's no way not to conclude that alchol is bad.
But not this one: However, looking at the larger picture alchol is very bad for society and the statistical human being.
All about context.

Funny how you didn't respond to any of the points I made regarding your absolutist statements.

What absolutive statements? I'm not an absolutionist.
And I've made my point allready and  I don't feel anything you've posted contradicts it.
I could start posting studies and statistics on how many people die in alchol related deseases, how many are killed while driving under the influence, how many cases of domestic abuse can be tied to substance abuse etc etc.
Or we could just trust the majority of goverments on earth, most health awareness groups, the medical system and acknowledge the fact the benefits of various drugs (and other addictive substances) does not outweigh the negative effects.
Of course some drugs are less bad than other drugs (I think society would be a little different if most people started their day with a shot of heroin instead of coffee) but my point does admitt that some drugs are worse than others.

I just think it's a lot healthier to view all drugs as bad (which I also think is true) because once you do you get aware of the fact that you should pay some attention to what your doing and that decreases the level of danger associated with use immensly, often to the point where the drug becomes completly harmless (and yes, perhaps even beneficial).
But that's down on the individual level which doesn't really matter that much.


And yeah, beer has been important for nutrition for a long time (ancient Egypt actually, some 4000+ years ago) but the historical beer was quite different from what we now view as beer, and equally important the society is quite different as well.
Logged

[when asked if any of the cast of his book series, "A Song of Ice and Fire", will be left alive]: "No one will be alive by the last book. In fact, they all die in the fifth. The sixth book will be just a thousand-page description of snow blowing across the graves ..."
8833_mr._gm.png
sinic Reply #29 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 14, 2006, 10:00:17 AM
Certified Organic

Renown: +125/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,234

Slack.

I think the absolutist statement she's making reference to is "I just think it's a lot healthier to view all drugs as bad."  I'm just curious what you mean by "drugs."  It sounds like you're lumping coffee into the drug category.  Are you saying coffee's bad?

I think it's a bit odd to say "Yes this is bad, but I will do it anyways."  That just sets up a weird logic gate.  Maybe you need to define "bad" as well?  Is it bad in any dose, bad in a therapeutic dose, bad at an impairing does or bad at a lethal dose?  I mean poisons are "bad", but if you take them at sub-lethal doses for a prolonged period of time you can build up a tolerance for them which could be seen as a "good" effect.

I think when making statements such as "All X are Y" you need to be very clear what X and Y are otherwise it can lead to a bit of confusion.  Of course if X and Y are absolute definitions without wiggle room then you're kind of being absolutist.  Make sense?
Logged

"When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other." -Eric Hoffer

House has a posse.
Puppy cam is:  Offline

12595_mr._tester.png
CuddlyCuteKitten Reply #30 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 14, 2006, 10:19:36 AM
Game Master
Renown: +17/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 779

I think the absolutist statement she's making reference to is "I just think it's a lot healthier to view all drugs as bad." I'm just curious what you mean by "drugs." It sounds like you're lumping coffee into the drug category. Are you saying coffee's bad?

I think it's a bit odd to say "Yes this is bad, but I will do it anyways." That just sets up a weird logic gate. Maybe you need to define "bad" as well? Is it bad in any dose, bad in a therapeutic dose, bad at an impairing does or bad at a lethal dose? I mean poisons are "bad", but if you take them at sub-lethal doses for a prolonged period of time you can build up a tolerance for them which could be seen as a "good" effect.

I think when making statements such as "All X are Y" you need to be very clear what X and Y are otherwise it can lead to a bit of confusion. Of course if X and Y are absolute definitions without wiggle room then you're kind of being absolutist. Make sense?

I'm not really thinking about coffee as a drug (and since I think in Swedish I differentiate between things like drugs and medication since drugs doesn't include medication) but yes it's an addicting substance so it's valid to the conversation. And technically it is a very mild drug and on a global scale probably not very healthy so yes, coffee is bad. Now please do not get hung up on this because yes I do realise that it's close to a zero sum equation.

And sinic, is everything you do good for you? I mean, driving a car destroys the enviroment and waste resources yet we do it anyway. Sitting in a chair for 8 hours at work is bad for the body, yet we do it anyway. There's so many things that aren't really good for us that we still do, and drugs are just one of them. Thinking that drugs are good stuff that has no ill effects is just stupid because if you want to reduce a risk you first have to acknowledge it.

And I've left plenty of wiggle room. All the way from bad as in coffee (which perhaps can give you an ulcer and make you very sligthly addicted to it) up to metaphmetamine or a bad dose of acid that will fuck you up permantly.
About the only good drug I can think of is "runners-high" which probably has a very positive effect on both individuals and on a higher level. But even that can suck if your stuck on a plane for 14 hours or something.
Logged

[when asked if any of the cast of his book series, "A Song of Ice and Fire", will be left alive]: "No one will be alive by the last book. In fact, they all die in the fifth. The sixth book will be just a thousand-page description of snow blowing across the graves ..."
8833_mr._gm.png
sinic Reply #31 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 14, 2006, 11:10:15 AM
Certified Organic

Renown: +125/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,234

Slack.

That's... an interesting definition of bad.  I think when you define bad that broadly it kind of loses any of its meaning.  I mean anything done to excess can be called bad.  I think looking at the case of moderate use or use within pre-defined limits is a more useful exercise.

I guess I see your point/view, I just don't agree with it or think it's terribly useful.  To each their own, though.
Logged

"When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other." -Eric Hoffer

House has a posse.
Puppy cam is:  Offline

12595_mr._tester.png
Badger Reply #32 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 14, 2006, 11:37:58 AM
Renown: +169/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,548

Swift as a deer, size of a dog, head like a monkey

That was exactly the absolutist attitude I was referring to, sinic.

Caffeine is a drug.  It's even available in pill form if you don't care to be bothered to drink coffee, tea, or soda.

CCK - I tend to think, myself, that the things you mention like drunk driving have nothing to do with alcohol itself.  Responsible drinkers can go their entire lives and never drive drunk, develop cirrhosis, or even become intoxicated.  Drunk driving and the diseases associated with alcohol are symptoms of the same social disease that gives us obesity - the philosophical worship of excess and the deterioration of personal responsibility.  A responsible eater will not become obese, a responsible drinker will not become a habitual drunk or a drunk driver, a responsible pot smoker will not become an addict.

Miss_N:  I must ask again for a citation.  The flavonoids don't seem to be the only benefit to alcohol consumption, so I'd like some evidence for your claim to that.  Please do try and realize that the noted heart health benefits aren't the only claimed beneficial uses of alcohol, so there's no need to confine yourself to that topic exclusively any more.  I'd specifically love to hear some evidence about flavonoids and dementia, or bone density.

In at least one of the studies regarding alcohol and dementia, the type of alcohol consumed didn't matter at all.  Red wine, white wine, liquor or beer, all seemed to have the same effects.  I know certain dark beers are pretty heavy on the flavonoids, but what about vodka or rum?  If red wine (red grape juice) has things white wine (white grape juice) doesn't have, but "The flavanoids are whats really good for you, which is in any type of alcohol," then what precisely is it about red wine (red grape juice) that makes it better than white wine (white grape juice)?  Which are you saying, that in opposition to your earlier statement, there *isn't* a difference between red and white, or that one gets the same health benefits whether one drinks grape juice, green tea, red wine, or Scotch?

Do please clarify.
Last Edit: May 14, 2006, 01:03:02 PM by Badger Logged

""We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer
Barefoot Priestess
CuddlyCuteKitten Reply #33 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 14, 2006, 12:27:24 PM
Game Master
Renown: +17/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 779

That's... an interesting definition of bad. I think when you define bad that broadly it kind of loses any of its meaning. I mean anything done to excess can be called bad. I think looking at the case of moderate use or use within pre-defined limits is a more useful exercise.

I guess I see your point/view, I just don't agree with it or think it's terribly useful. To each their own, though.

Moderate use is IMHO hard to achive if your not aware of the consequences. I view drugs a bit like I view cars. If you control them they can be usefull and quite fun but you need to do it rigth and allways be aware of the inherent danger of two tons of metal moving at high speed. Of course with the focus on awarnes. There's no need to fear cars but you have to respect what they can do to you. And drugs aren't really as usefull as cars.

Otherwise, agreed on difference in oppinion. Smile
Last Edit: May 14, 2006, 01:03:05 PM by CuddlyCuteKitten Logged

[when asked if any of the cast of his book series, "A Song of Ice and Fire", will be left alive]: "No one will be alive by the last book. In fact, they all die in the fifth. The sixth book will be just a thousand-page description of snow blowing across the graves ..."
8833_mr._gm.png
Altara Reply #34 in Re: Drugs and Addiction — Posted May 14, 2006, 10:05:44 PM

Renown: +10/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,220

Talenabob Sassypants



Drug Use:  Self explanatory. 
Drug abuse:  Using irresponsibly.  Like drinking and driving.  Smoking and operating heavy machinery. Doing excessive amounts. Etc.
Drug addiction:  When you become dependant on it.  I, personally, think it's an addiction when you develope an impulse to do it.  I think there are different levels of addiction.  I do not necessarily think addiction is bad. 
I do not view addiction as a bad thing until it places itself, priority wise, over things it shouldn't.  For example, not paying a bill so you can buy some alcohol. 
If you are addicted to pain killers, and they alleviate your pain, there is nothing wrong with that.  Addiction does not equal abuse.  If you are addicted to weed, and it helps alleviate pain and keeps your mood stable, there is nothing wrong with that. 

I don't think there is anything wrong with any drug unless it is having a negative impact on your life or someone else, like a child, who's quality of life is being reduced by it.
Logged

If the thought of something makes me giggle for longer than 15 seconds, I am to assume that I am not allowed to do it.  "skippy's list"
Index Pages: 1 [2]
  |  Reply