I find that list annoying because it's cribbed from a racism list and is suffering for it the same way a list of sports jokes would suffer if you replaced the word "football" with "ping-pong".

Mainly though I dislike it because I think feminism should be about equality, and promotion of feminism ought to be structured to be inclusive. But that list is divisive right from the get go (the title). I'd like it a lot better if it were a list constructed to highlight the different privilege that different genders have, and I think people like Johnny would probably react a lot better to it if it were.

Because really, it's no more right to expect every man to like tools than it is to expect every woman to want to have kids. I see the problem as being one of different expectations for the genders, while this list seems to see the problem as different expectations for women.

 Not to mention that it's western-centric and ignores huge issues world wide.

I find that list annoying because it's cribbed from a racism list and is suffering for it the same way a list of sports jokes would suffer if you replaced the word "football" with "ping-pong".

Mainly though I dislike it because I think feminism should be about equality, and promotion of feminism ought to be structured to be inclusive. But that list is divisive right from the get go (the title). I'd like it a lot better if it were a list constructed to highlight the different privilege that different genders have, and I think people like Johnny would probably react a lot better to it if it were.

Because really, it's no more right to expect every man to like tools than it is to expect every woman to want to have kids. I see the problem as being one of different expectations for the genders, while this list seems to see the problem as different expectations for women.

 Not to mention that it's western-centric and ignores huge issues world wide.

Signed for all of this.  That's a pretty good sum-up of the issue as I see it, also.

I'm all wrong, everything I have said is wrong, and I am an awful, evil person for saying it. There we go. You win. Conversation ended.

Oh, dear crappiness, they did it again.
>.< I hates my police force, I do.

Let's start with this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1392667/School-orders-pupils-wear-baggy-clothes-deter-paedophiles-like-boys-tight-trousers.html
And then this:
http://www.torontosun.com/2011/10/07/girls-in-private-school-uniformed-harassed-on-ttc

ARRRGGGHHH!!! The problem is not what they're weari-*sighs* Again?
ZOMG! U NOT WEAR UNIFORMS CUZ BAD PEOPLEZ IZ LOOKINGZ UP UR SKIRTZ!
....
Aaaaand, the problem is the skirts, now, and, y'know, not the evil crazy-dude trying to rape young women. Look, I'm utterly drunk and even *I* see the flaws in that train of thought.

Dear ladyfolk: On behalf of my country and police-force, I heartily apologize.
They're kinda dumb. They may mean well. [They do.] But they're still kinda dumb.

THIS MESSAGE BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY SKIRTS!
Skirts. They are awesome. Flirts in skirts are even better.

And now I've just obliterated every point I was trying to make.

Wait. I had a point? *meep*