General Statistics
Total Posts: 269107
Total Topics: 4548
Online Today: 24
Online Ever: 127, on March 13, 2007, 12:56:10 PM
Users Online
Totals
Users: 7
Guests: 12
Total: 19
Index Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9
007bistromath    Topic opened July 09, 2008, 02:51:00 PM
Renown: +118/-91
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,571

Left his attack boots in China

http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00168

Yeah, that's right. Him and 21 other traitors to liberalism.

Fuck this government.
Logged

The internet is a joke. And facebook is the punchline. - Bunner
dadu Reply #1 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 03:04:02 PM
I've donated. Why haven't you?

Renown: +63/-12
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,097

Are we debating whether he voted for it or whether to fuck this government?  I'm confused.
Logged

A solution to your problems...
Remember, the Debate forum is serious bidness.
The P.u.P.P Reply #2 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 03:05:39 PM
Game Master

Renown: +122/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,397

There are kangaroos in the world

Generally politics things have gone in debate. *shrugs*
Logged

"Are you crazy, are you dumb, are you made of apple crumbs?"
8833_mr._gm.png
007bistromath Reply #3 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 03:07:37 PM
Renown: +118/-91
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,571

Left his attack boots in China

Are we debating whether he voted for it or whether to fuck this government?  I'm confused.
Well, some people might be afraid they'll get crabs.

ObSrs: I guess this thread can be for people to decide whether Obama is still worth voting for, or if this is more proof that the Dems and Reps are just the two ropes which secure the yoke of corporate oppression.
Last Edit: July 09, 2008, 03:11:04 PM by 007bistromath Logged

The internet is a joke. And facebook is the punchline. - Bunner
machiavelli33 Reply #4 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 03:14:45 PM
Game Master

Renown: +48/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,045

Not your typical chinaman.

"Traitors to liberalism"?  Wasn't this attitude part of the problem in the first place?
Logged

"Wasn't until years later we found out what fag -really- meant."
"-You're- a fag."
"No no...a fag's a cigarette...remember?"
"-You're- a cigarette."

8833_mr._gm.png
007bistromath Reply #5 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 03:19:04 PM
Renown: +118/-91
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,571

Left his attack boots in China

Everyone who voted for this is wiping their ass with the Constitution. They all sort of took a vow to not do that. Seems pretty treacherous.
Logged

The internet is a joke. And facebook is the punchline. - Bunner
jabbaciv Reply #6 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 03:32:12 PM
All Klingon in the Pants

Renown: +68/-15
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,281

We can't stop here, this is bat country

He voted for the bill to update FISA. This bill had telecom immunity included because of a complete lack of strong opposition to telecom immunity in the Senate, the House, and the general public at large. The sad fact is that, while the netroots and while progressives like myself may feel very strongly about the issue of telecom immunity, most people do not. Most people figure that, if they were in charge of a telephone company and after 9/11 the government came in and told them that the government needed to install some equipment to fight terrorism and keep Americans safe, they would go along with it.

That's the problem, most people in this country don't feel that deeply about telecom immunity in FISA. A majority oppose warrantless wiretapping, and a smaller majority may even oppose telecom immunity, but they completely failed to make their voices heard in enough of a way to make a difference. Even if Obama had voted against the bill, or sat it out entirely like McCain did, it would have passed.

And the truth is, objectively, it's not that big of an issue. When you consider all of the things that the Bush Administration has done, the issue of whether or not AT&T should be sued simply doesn't rank that highly. If this is a make or break issue for anybody, they need a whirl through the Total Perspective Vortex. Realistically the odds of any political candidates positions agreeing 100% with any individual voter's positions are very low, and odds are that such a candidate wouldn't be elected, as political candidates (especially for national office) have to have broad appeal. There's some things that we idealistic progressives will simply never get, even though by all rights we should. Those things are:
-A pullout from Iraq by the end of the year
-convictions and jail time for Bush, Cheney, and associated conspirators
-lawsuits and fines for any business that went along with the Bush Administration
and I'm sure there's many more.

We're not going to get these things. This does not mean that government is a complete failure, it means that government is riddled with compromises. I'll be happy with an end to state-sponsored torture, an eventual withdrawal from Iraq (we want to be gone, they want us gone, let's make it happen), not going to war with Iran, increased subsidies for green energy, government acknowledgment of the climate crisis (instead of petulant refusal to open all those cautionary emails from the EPA), and so on.

But if you want to vote for McCain, or not vote at all, or vote for Nader or Barr, go right ahead. Just don't bitch about McCain winning. Change takes time, and leaving the game when you don't get everything you want, when the first pawn gets captured, is petulant and defeatist.
Logged

Don't confuse a position that is both a logically and morally defensible one with dogma.
"The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times." -SCOTUS Justice Kennedy
007bistromath Reply #7 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 03:44:31 PM
Renown: +118/-91
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,571

Left his attack boots in China

I don't see how this is a small issue. This is a harbinger of worse things to come. It is a blatant announcement that 1) nobody in Washington is going to do jack shit about eroding corporate accountability 2) everybody in Washington is pleased as punch to use corporations as their weapon of choice in the fight against civil liberty. Some of us have been aware of that for quite a while, but this roll call is a confirmation that many of the people we thought might be at least some improvement over the status quo are in fact either eunuchs or liars.
Logged

The internet is a joke. And facebook is the punchline. - Bunner
S*S Reply #8 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 04:14:44 PM
Game Master

Renown: +179/-69
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,821

I don't care about this issue, either. Sure, it would've been nice if corperations were the type of entities to make a stand for liberty and civil rights at the possible risk of legal censure, but for the most part, being legally compelled to do something by a government doesn't make you evil.

I do think the whole immunity thing IS bullshit, as it smells of backroom dealings or behind the scenes manipulation. Who says the american public shouldn't be allowed to hold whoever they damn well please accountable for this, should evidence arise that causes them to feel like it, later? At the same time, though, Id rather hold accountable the people who were actually responsible.
Logged

...It's JOHNNY. Jeepers, how hard do you think it is to distract him?  It's like, more difficult to distract a kitten. -Majestrix
Most [political] problems are the product of complex conditions. They require trade-offs and policy expertise. They are not solvable through the mere assertion of sterling character.
What are good/neutral things about me?/Bad things about me?

8833_mr._gm.png
Coani Reply #9 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 04:40:21 PM

Renown: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 774

I don't know about Illinois, but in my section of Washington State, the Senator votes based on what the people she represents want.  I know because I'm on her mailing list, I've sent so many opinion emails that I automatically get emailed her thoughts on various subjects.  If enough of us contact her, her representative will call a meeting at one of the local colleges or universities, and based on what is said during these meetings, she may change her intended vote to reflect us. 
But we're kinda backwards up here in Eastern Washington.
Logged

Cthulhu hugs make everything better.
jabbaciv Reply #10 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 05:08:20 PM
All Klingon in the Pants

Renown: +68/-15
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,281

We can't stop here, this is bat country

There's energy that people are expending on this fight that could be much better spent on clearer fights. It's hard enough to get people to see the problem with the FISA issue, much less the nuances of the telecom immunity fight. The constitution has already been shredded. An old woman got ticketed outside of a McCain rally for merely holding up a sign that said "McCain=Bush". That to me is a bigger deal then telecom immunity.
Logged

Don't confuse a position that is both a logically and morally defensible one with dogma.
"The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times." -SCOTUS Justice Kennedy
Kyle J Cardoza Reply #11 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 05:13:06 PM
Administrator

Renown: +55/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,320

You're surrounded by armed bastards!

Yeah, man. Sure, the FISA issue sucks, but it can wait to be fixed until we're out of the Middle East, into Darfur, President Bunnypants is an unpleasant memory, we stop supporting China, start investing in countries rather than giving them handouts, let gays marry and adopt, and crush Scientology under our jackboots.
Logged

Gene: He's a bum bandit; do you understand? A poof, a fairy, a queer, a queen, fudge-packer, uphill gardener, fruit picking sodomite.
Sam: He's gay?
Gene: As a bloody Christmas tree!

12595_mr._tester.png
007bistromath Reply #12 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 05:23:34 PM
Renown: +118/-91
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,571

Left his attack boots in China

An old woman got ticketed outside of a McCain rally for merely holding up a sign that said "McCain=Bush".
what

sauce plox
Logged

The internet is a joke. And facebook is the punchline. - Bunner
Imaginary Reply #13 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 05:44:03 PM
Renown: +13/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 577

sqrt(-1)

I don't care about this issue, either. Sure, it would've been nice if corporations were the type of entities to make a stand for liberty and civil rights at the possible risk of legal censure, but for the most part, being legally compelled to do something by a government doesn't make you evil.

See, that's the part that really burns my ass, is how badly the public has been misled about what's at stake in this whole issue.  The telephone companies were NOT legally compelled to offer up the entirety of the phone network to government wiretaps.  They were, in fact, specifically legally compelled to NOT allow the government to do so, per the original FISA legislation.  They were asked to by the government, and were told that they would be (illegally) removed from the bidding for several lucrative government contracts if they didn't do so, but the law was absolutely unambiguous that they were supposed to tell the feds to go stuff themselves.

This isn't just about the wiretapping, this is fundamentally about rule of law for thee but not for me.  These are companies that deliberately broke the law in order to increase their own profits.  It's the quintessential example of why we have laws in the first place.  But because they did so in cahoots with powerful Washington interests, they get to walk away scot free.

But due to the fact that the reporting on this issue (like everything else that can't be explained by the pregnancy of Brittany Spears) has been quarter-assed at best, we've got S*S up there, speaking for Joe Average, saying that what would have been nice is if the telecoms had defied the law to stand up for civil rights.  And that's 100% wrong.  What would have been nice is if the telecoms had OBEYED the law to stand up for civil rights, instead of simply following the profit, and then been handed the retroactive validation.
Logged

Surely the hero is the one who rescues someone.  Not the one who ineffectually combusts under basic fiery conditions.
Scary-Go-Round,  March 4, 2008
Roder Reply #14 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 06:12:06 PM
Renown: +43/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,796

Quote
When you consider all of the things that the Bush Administration has done, the issue of whether or not AT&T should be sued simply doesn't rank that highly. If this is a make or break issue for anybody, they need a whirl through the Total Perspective Vortex.

Is this that old "compromise" thing I keep hearing Democrats should be doing more? Because you know what? Fuck that shit. Call me an idealist, but if enough people stop caring about the "small" abuses, it will only invite more of them, as well as more of the bigger ones, since those will become the new "small" abuses. I mean, who's gonna care about habeus corpus if there's a bigger issue on the table, like say, a secret police running around? This is one of the places where that old slippery slope argument is really something to worry about, because as history has shown time and time again, all descent into an oppressive society starts small. Just because there are abuses more egregious doesn't mean that the less egregious abuses are ok. They're still abuses, and there's still no excuse for voting for them the way Obama did. And it's not like we liberals have limited energy or resources to fight shit like this -- I mean, come on, how much energy would it have taken for Obama and a larger number of Dems in the Senate to, you know, vote AGAINST this bill? Is it that much to "fight" for? You raise your damn hand, and you say, "Nay".

As for Obama voting for this? It's go left in the primary, and run to the center in the general. He's a politician, not the messiah. I'm going to respect him a hell of a lot less for this, that's for sure, and I actually think he isn't doing himself any favors by pandering to the right and right-of-center (since if anyone is solidly for McCain, it's that group), but I can't say I'm terribly surprised.
Last Edit: July 09, 2008, 06:20:45 PM by Roder Logged

Science is not only compatible with spirituality. It is a profound source of spirituality. -- Carl Sagan
007bistromath Reply #15 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 06:14:06 PM
Renown: +118/-91
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,571

Left his attack boots in China

As for Obama voting for this? It's go left in the primary, and run to the center in the general. He's a politician, not the messiah.
Isn't the larger, more damning point here that what Obama did during the primary is what passes for "going left" these days? We're getting to the point that people who call out the government's blatant constitutional apathy are "extremist." How are we supposed to fix this? Can't do it through the media, Fox owns that. Can't do it through the Internet, Time Warner owns that. Can't do it in the voting booth, Diebold owns that.
Last Edit: July 09, 2008, 06:15:54 PM by 007bistromath Logged

The internet is a joke. And facebook is the punchline. - Bunner
Roder Reply #16 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 06:24:59 PM
Renown: +43/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,796

PS: But, Imaginary, don't you know we don't have the time or energy to sue large corporations for government-sponsored white collar crime? After all, who can expect a company to go for anything other than profits, especially when we do have SUCH bigger things to worry about.

Yes, that is sarcasm. Yes, I am angry, because it's gotten to the point where even self-identified left "extremists" like Jabba are starting to get apathetic about liberal causes, which in itself as a leaning to the right. And that makes people like me look real crazy, all because we actively care about crazy things like checks and balances, rule of law, and civil liberties.
Last Edit: July 09, 2008, 06:30:15 PM by Roder Logged

Science is not only compatible with spirituality. It is a profound source of spirituality. -- Carl Sagan
Kyle J Cardoza Reply #17 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 06:33:14 PM
Administrator

Renown: +55/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,320

You're surrounded by armed bastards!

Dude, Roder, not that you're wrong in wanting to make corporations accountable (in principle, I agree, and would probably go way farther than you would!), but let's make the government respect our rights before we go after the corporations. Once we get a government that actually believes in true civilization, then we'll see about eliminating corporate personhood and locking up criminal executives who act in collusion with corrupt officials.

I'm not saying we should give up the fight, just that we should prioritize our efforts such that we're always getting the biggest possible return for them.
Logged

Gene: He's a bum bandit; do you understand? A poof, a fairy, a queer, a queen, fudge-packer, uphill gardener, fruit picking sodomite.
Sam: He's gay?
Gene: As a bloody Christmas tree!

12595_mr._tester.png
Roder Reply #18 in You'll Never Guess Who Voted For FISA Telecomm Immunity — Posted July 09, 2008, 06:37:32 PM
Renown: +43/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,796

And again, why can't we do both? Are our resources really that limited? Again, all the Senators had to do was vote No. There is no need to prioritize here other than feeling scared because we're feeling overwhelmed... which is fine, but not an excuse to give up any fights.
Last Edit: July 09, 2008, 06:58:10 PM by Roder Logged