I'll go ahead and approve Galapagos then. Though I don't particularly like that the castes correspond directly to numbers... I don't mind the sub-numbering within them, like, "I am a shaman of the third order" (Shaman 3), "Oh well I am a sergeant of the fifth order, you must obey me" (Sergeant 5).Though I'm thinking those of equal-ish caste (shaman/sergeant/honored warrior) should mostly leave each other alone as they shouldn't be competing directly with each other...?
Underclass: 0Sayers: - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Soldiers: - - - - - - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Saviors: - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Venerated: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Holiest: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1
I guess I just don't like actually calling them "Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3". It seems false, like it wouldn't have evolved that way naturally. Ya know?I'm fine with the "who outranks who" mechanic, especially with your extended chart, I just want it to sound purtier.