I'm puzzled by this concept of pretty ladies not being adequately sexed by their mates.
It puzzled me too, a long while ago. But as surprising as it may seem, some people are willing to accept inadequacy in the sack for a variety of different reasons.And of course the sack isn't the end all and be all, of all relationships.I suspect a chuck of it is "many people don't know better." Hell, till 2004, mind you, I labored under the mistaken idea that women disliked sex, had to be talked into it, and viewed intimacy with distaste--as something be tolerated like a dental visit, tax audit, or oil change.
lack in QUANTITY does not assume a lack of QUALITY of the sex that is had.
Why do people accept dissatisfaction in the realm of intimacy?